Interested in photography? At kaitphotography.com.au you will find all the information about Sct Vs Newtonian For Astrophotography and much more about photography.
SCT vs Newtonian for 100% visual use - Cloudy Nights
- https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/285671-sct-vs-newtonian-for-100-visual-use/#:~:text=Per%20unit%20of%20aperture%2C%20Newtonians%20have%20better%20resolution,work%20as%20well%20as%20many%20kinds%20of%20photography.
- none
Image comparison for a Newtonian vs an SCT - Cloudy Nights
- https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/807651-image-comparison-for-a-newtonian-vs-an-sct/
- 1. 8" Newtonian (800 mm FL) F/4 with a 2x Barlow and effective FL of 1600 mm . 2. An 8" SCT (1600 mm FL approx) (F/8) For these two configurations both have the same FL, and let us say I plan to use a ZWO 533MC. I assume the SCT will require a longer exposure for the same object because it is slower.
SCT vs Newtonian for 100% visual use - Page 2 - Cloudy …
- https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/285671-sct-vs-newtonian-for-100-visual-use/page-2
- To me, an SCT is an astrophotography platform, whereas a Newtonian is a more visual platform. You can use both for either, but my experience is that Newts are much better for visual use. I believe I'm in the minority on that.
Fast newtownian vs SCT for visual use? - Cloudy Nights
- https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/604375-fast-newtownian-vs-sct-for-visual-use/
- Here is what I know about comparing a fast newtonian to an SCT, with visual use considerations: 1) newtownian/astrograph will be physically larger and requires a coma corrector 2) field of view will be wider / mag will be lower on the astrograph for the same eyepiece compared to an f/10 SCT
SCT vs. Newtonian for visual - Discussions - Stargazers …
- https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/40151-sct-vs-newtonian-for-visual/
- Question from a non-online friend of mine. He's looking at buying a larger-aperture telescope for visual use only, and is looking at either a 12" f/5 Newtonian or a C11 + f/6.3 reducer on a EQ6. Currently using a 100mm refractor, and is looking for a big step up in light grasp to move on to the f...
Choosing between a RC or SCT optical design - Cloudy …
- https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/416944-choosing-between-a-rc-or-sct-optical-design/
- Looks like it can be a hard choice between buying a Ritchey-Chrétien (RC) and a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope (SCT) for astrophotography. Although with the lower prices for a 12 inch GSO RC I tend to go for an RC rather then a SCT (e.g. C11). Advantages for a RC optical design. Maksutovs or SCT have spherical mirrors and need image correctors, and contrary to …
Astrophotography: Newtonian v SCT -- Astronomy & Celestial Talk …
- https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=18346131
- But each one has a strength for different forms of astro. A newtonian for example is a short fast instrument and an SCT is generally a longer slower instrument. Both have different attributes that you'd have to correct for in some way. But there's nothing wrong with an inexpensive newtonian reflector, nor a small SCT.
At which point does a SCT outperform a refractor?: Astrophotography …
- https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3907115
- Aperture area is key in astrophotography, both in resolution and light collection. The only question is will the intended subject fit in the field of view with a given focal length? Contrast depends more on build quality than a particular design. Am 8-inch f/10 SCT versus an 81 mm lens (f/5?) is really for different targets.
Newtonian Telescope vs Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope
- https://telescopes4kids.com/newtonian-telescope-vs-schmidt-cassegrain-telescope/
- The Newtonian telescopes still remain best for anyone who is looking to get into the hobby of stargazing and deep space photography, even though they are a little bit harder to maintain. The design of the Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes makes them be a bit more expensive than their Newtonian counterpart, while not allowing them to reach a big size.
Newtonian for astrophotography - Digital Photography Review
- https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3796581
- For astrophotography you should stay -20% under the max. weight your mount can afford and for Newtons - as they are so large that's an absolute minimum. A 150/750mm Newton would be even better - especially if using an APS-C sized SLR for the field of view. kind regards, -- hide signature --. Michael S.
RC, Newtonian Astrograph, or Edge HD - AstroBin
- https://www.astrobin.com/forum/c/astrophotography/equipment/rc-newtonian-astrograph-or-edge-hd/
- Newtonian is a good instrument, but probably it is harder to handle (collimation and balancing above all). Also the edge HD is a good instrument, but I'm not sure that the difference of prize with a C8 "normal" can be justified. A lot of people use the GSO RC, I think that for deepsky it could be a good choise.
Found information about Sct Vs Newtonian For Astrophotography? We have a lot more interesting things about photography. Look at similar pages for example.