Interested in photography? At kaitphotography.com.au you will find all the information about A Photograph Is Not A Work Of Art and much more about photography.
Can a photograph be a work of art? - Photo.net Photography Foru…
- https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/can-a-photograph-be-a-work-of-art.200835/#:~:text=Answer%3A%20A%20photograph%20is%20a%20disposition%20of%20sensible,Therefore%20it%20is%20not%20a%20work%20of%20art.
- none
Is Photography Art? — Both Sides of the Debate Explained
- https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/is-photography-art-debate/
- The answer may be subjective. In the debate over is photography a form of art, suggesting that capturing reality is not artistic devalues the important photographic work done by the likes of war journalists, which is not a favorable …
Photography: is it art? | Photography | The Guardian
- https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/oct/19/photography-is-it-art
- My Grandchild by Julia Margaret Cameron. Photograph: Hulton/Getty. What some pioneering photographers recognised straight away …
Can a photograph be a work of art? - Photo.net …
- https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/can-a-photograph-be-a-work-of-art.200835/
- A photograph is a disposition of sensible matter and may be so. disposed for an aesthetic end but it is not a human disposition of. sensible matter. Therefore it is not a work of art. - James Joyce.
What Makes a Photograph a Work of Art? – Photographers' …
- https://photographersselection.org/2022/02/what-makes-a-photograph-a-work-of-art/
- What Makes a Photograph a Work of Art? The subject of a photograph does not always determine whether it is a work of art. The subject can be a person, a building, a pet, a still life, or any other subject. A great photographer can use all of these elements to create a work of art. A great photograph can inspire people to seek greater adventure and fulfillment.
Why do people think photography is not art?
- https://www.photographytalk.com/forum/new-to-photographytalk-forum/295503-why-do-people-think-photography-is-not-art
- It is an art. Photography has the ability to convey a story, record a moment in time, document, and an expression of oneself. It is definitely an art.
Why is photography not fine art? - Quora
- https://www.quora.com/Why-is-photography-not-fine-art
- initially, photography is a technical skill and things along those lines … but since it can be used in many different ways, no one says it cannot be used as a fine art media … in fact, even painting is initially a technical skill, mixed with a lot of science and technology as is photography … but since painting is much older than photography and mostly used by artists for artistic expressions, …
Question: Can a Photograph Be Considered a Work of …
- https://www.nytimes.com/1932/04/03/archives/question-can-a-photograph-be-considered-a-work-of-art-if-good.html
- As an art; feature article. CERTAINLY a photograph can be a work of art -- if we accept the definition of art as the presentation of a subject in a manner that wakes up our esthetic sense.
The Line Between Art and Photography | HuffPost …
- https://www.huffpost.com/entry/art-and-photography_b_4297646
- I think there are two extremes of photographic interpretation that can legitimately be called art -- the kind that uses photography as the medium only, but doesn't play to its strengths (exact reproduction) or processes away from the real -- it can be done well (think Warhol) or badly (think hipstagram). One is repeatable, the other isn't - and ...
Sorry, but Your Photography Is Not Fine Art. Here’s Why
- https://fstoppers.com/fine-art/sorry-your-photography-not-fine-art-heres-why-457183
- Typically, the purchase of a work of art is a financial investment, in part relying on the fact that it’s not going to fade, flake away, or fall apart after a …
Found information about A Photograph Is Not A Work Of Art? We have a lot more interesting things about photography. Look at similar pages for example.